➡️ What types of cases do you have at Jus Mundi?
This type includes all the advisory proceedings of the ICJ, PCIJ, ITLOS and Ad hoc (i.e. PCIJ - Designation of the Workers’ Delegate for the Netherlands at the Third Session of the International Labour Conference, ICJ - Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, ITLOS - Request for an Advisory Opinion submitted by the Sub-Regional Fisheries Commission, Ad hoc - Interpretation of the air transport services agreement between the United States of America and Italy, signed at Rome on 6 February 1948).
This type includes purely commercial contract-based arbitration without states/wholly state-owned entities involved (i.e. Gazprom v. Naftogaz) and some cases with States/State entities involved (i.e. Commission Import Export S.A. v. Republic of the Congo).
This type includes disputes between sovereign states in different courts and arbitration tribunals (i.e. PCIJ - S.S. "Wimbledon", ICJ - Maritime Delimitation in the Caribbean Sea and the Pacific Ocean (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua), ITLOS - The M/V "SAIGA" Case, LCIA/PCA/Other - Republic of Ecuador v. United States of America).
This type includes disputes between Investors and States (i.e. Capital Financial Holdings v. Cameroon), Exception: if the case is purely commercial arbitration (e.g. sale of goods), i.e. Paragon Systems v. Republic of Korea (this case is not included in our Database), the object of this case was the purchase of printers, which has nothing to do with investment. Such cases are included in the commercial arbitration category.
Iran – US Claims
This type includes cases by the Iran – US Claims Tribunal.
This type includes cases by international compensation commissions (i.e. Neer v. Mexico).
This type includes cases by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (i.e. Al-Jazira Football Sports Company v. FIFA)
This type includes other cases/decision/national decision related to Investment Arbitration and International Law (i.e. Abyei Arbitration).
➡️ What status of cases do you have at Jus Mundi?
Concluded (non-ISDS cases)
This status includes the outcome of the Commercial Arbitration, Sports Arbitration, Inter-State, Iran-US, Mixed Commission, and Other cases.
This status includes the outcome of the Inter-State cases brought before WTO (i.e. European Communities — Measures Affecting Asbestos and Products Containing Asbestos, WT/DS135, AB-2000-11 - Report of the Appellate Body, 12 March 2001).
Decided in favor of the investor
This status includes Investor-State cases where damages were awarded to the investor. Important: Even if the investor was seeking more damages than the amount awarded, we still put Decided in favor of investor status.
Decided in favor of neither party
This status includes Investor-State cases where the liability of a State was recognized but no damages awarded (i.e. Cervin Investissements v. Costa Rica) and other cases where neither party prevailed (i.e. Al-Warraq v. Indonesia).
Decided in favor of State
This status includes Investor-State cases where a State prevailed (i.e. no jurisdiction found or no violation found).
This status includes Investor-State and Inter-State cases where the proceeding was discontinued.
This status includes Investor-State, Inter-State and Other cases (i.e. Investor-State Republic of Equatorial Guinea v. CMS Energy Corporation and others.).
This status includes all Pending cases
This status includes all Annulment/Rectification/Resubmission/Revision Proceedings cases before ICSID.
This status includes all advisory opinions or reports
This status includes all cases that have been settled.
This status includes cases where we are aware of the existence of a case, but we don’t know the outcome or status.
This status includes cases where the notice of dispute was filed but the case was further withdrawn by the Claimant.